Notes from Drums for Peace-Meeting | |||||||
Sunday 23.11.2008 | |||||||
All implemented projects have been very succesfull, | |||||||
1. |
GLOBAL SOUNDS exchange in youth-centre Cassiopeia was an experiment on making a specific music-exchange. The 4 workshops was: percussion, stomp, human beat-box and ”how to be on stage” and the was made on rotation basis. Besides this was offered band playing for everybody on 3 different levels according to the many informations on instrument, band experience, yers playing an instrument etc. Collected before the exchange. and also additional workshops on percussion, stomp and humna-beat-box was made for those who wanted so. A public presentation / concert was made with the different band groups as well as the workshops. | ||||||
2. |
BRIDGES exchange in DK got approved 2.000 € for paying a free-lance-journalist produce articles on the exchange and the DfP-methodology and to secure that they were printed in relevant newsletters. They were brought 3 times in pedagogical union newsletters and probably seen by 30.000 Danish professionals. | ||||||
3. |
TERE exchange in Estonia resulted in this discussion on "Youthpass", which is the ”Youth in Action” recommended certificate It is not necessary with a general common DfP-praxis on youtpass, and a further discussion will be made next year, when more people and organisations have experiences on the production of this. | ||||||
4. |
RHYTHM seminar was focussing on the influence of rhythm on our mind and body and combined the practical hands on drumming with inputs from music-therapy, psychology a.o. All participants had to reflect and describe own experiences. The seminar was also part of the DfP -documentation strategy. | ||||||
5. |
ACTING AROUND exchange in Wales resulted in a discussion on the the public presentation part of a DfP-exchange: - DfP-guidelines tells: ”Drums for Peace workshops are mainly based on the following model: The workshops are brought together and shown to an audience. This can be an invited audience such as a school, or the public.” - ”Process or Product” is not the issue for this discussion. The presentation is an important part of the process and especially when working with disadvantaged people. o The presentation brings the full group together o Rotation and no presentation is unknown methodology and difficulkt to explain to potential participants, who expect the usual DfP-concept. | ||||||
6. |
Many projects (Ariadne’s Thread, ASA 08 + our meeting) and especially some of the not approved projects had experienced missing or very slow and late feed back with information to DfP-coordinator.
A wellfunctioning network demands a continuosly communication from each organisation. | ||||||
7. |
A procedure is needed on how to find additional partners in case a project needs some after the DfP-meeting. | ||||||
8. |
The meeting had a long discussion on alcohol after the presentation of ”MOJN” exchange in DK for which the Swedish group on forehand had agreed not to drink any alcohol during the week.
- Important issue to talk more abou - Maybe offering non-alcohol youth-exchanges in same way as we are not focussing on specific age-groups (13-18 or 15-19 etc.) - More focus of the preparation of the group before the exchange | ||||||
To DfP-meeting Monday 24.11 | |||||||
To DfP mainsite | 2018 Calender |